FQHCs and Critical Access Hospitals rely heavily on grant funding to expand services, support workforce development, and improve care quality. Yet as grant programs become increasingly competitive, health centers need to do more than promise quality—they must prove it. That’s where peer review metrics come in.

Metrics That Show You’re Serious About Quality

When grant reviewers evaluate applications, they’re looking for evidence of a robust, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. Peer review is a foundational part of that, but it’s often underutilized in grant narratives. A few examples of metrics that demonstrate excellence include:

• Percent of providers reviewed each quarter
• Turnaround time from review request to completion
• Number of subspecialist reviews
• Rate of deficiencies identified and remediated
• Provider participation rates
• Documented changes resulting from peer review findings

These metrics reflect a culture of accountability and continuous improvement. They show your organization isn’t just checking the box on compliance—but using peer review to drive clinical excellence.

From Data to Storytelling

Peer review metrics aren’t just numbers. When framed effectively, they become powerful tools for narrative storytelling in grant applications:

“In 2024, our center completed 210 peer reviews across all providers. 17% identified opportunities for improvement, with 100% of those cases resulting in remediation plans. In one case, a pattern of missed screenings led to system-wide EHR alerts that improved compliance by 25%.”

This kind of evidence shows reviewers that your organization is serious about quality—and capable of using grant dollars to produce measurable results.

External Peer Review as a Signal of Excellence

Internal reviews are important, but external peer review adds credibility that grant reviewers notice. Objective, third-party reviews are:

• Unbiased and defensible
• Completed by the appropriate license level or subspecialist
• Easier to validate as part of a quality improvement plan

Adding even a small percentage of external reviews to your overall QAPI process can elevate your grant proposal and reduce compliance risk.

Making Metrics Easy with Digital Tools

Peer review data can be hard to collect consistently—especially with busy providers. But with a digital platform like Medplace, FQHCs can:

• Automate review scheduling and completion tracking
• Export reports with charts, trends, and key metrics
• Use dashboards to share progress with internal teams or grant writers

These tools reduce the administrative burden while creating clear, exportable evidence of your efforts.

Bottom Line: Better Metrics Mean Better Grants

If your peer review program is delivering value, you should be using that value to win grants. By focusing on consistent processes, actionable insights, and credible external reviews, your organization can stand out—not just for meeting the minimum requirements, but for exceeding them.

‍